Country Men; or, What Comes After Proud Boys

I was taking a hill walk this afternoon, as is my wont, when I had a glimpse of the future. Not an actual prophetic vision, mind you; more of an intuition. But it’s worth sharing, since a lot of people don’t have the right experience to see where this is going.

I was pondering the power vacuum in places like Portland, where the police are standing down in the face of revolutionary communist street thugs, and civic-minded groups like the Proud Boys are being harassed (both legally and illegally) out of existence.

What’s interesting about it is that in this case, nobody from inside the city can step up to preserve social order, because they’ll just get doxxed, threatened, and harassed at work and at home. So that means that the vacuum will be filled by outsiders.

Now, what you might not know is that out in the country, good ol’ boys still grow up fighting, and “faggot” and “queer” are still fighting words. And damn near every Portland male looks like a queer to them, except for the ones that they would mistake for tomboys.

So as the eternal presidential campaign grinds slowly on, and the “protests” gradually escalate into full-blown city-burning riots, I can practically guarantee that there will be some hard young men within a 45-minute drive that would like to get in on that action.

But the funny thing is that their idea of fun would likely result in restoring social order the old-fashioned way, by knocking heads together. Once they realize that the antifa, black bloc, &c. are not only queers but also commies, I think they will find it irresistible.

They won’t have an organization for SJWs to infiltrate; if nobody there knows you and can vouch for you, then you’re a narc and they ain’t telling you shit. And if they even bother to use any name at all, then I would expect them to employ the flair and panache for which they are world-famous, and call themselves something fancy and sesquipedalian like the Country Men.

I wanted to share this with you, because for once, I saw something that I hope actually comes true. It would be funny as hell, and I hope you enjoyed the view.

No Anarchists, Only Communists

I was shocked to read Robert Vincent’s recent article in American Thinker, “The Left's Endgame Is Not Chaos. It's Worse,” which was recommended by Instapundit, The Other McCain, and Ace of Spades. I had vaguely suspected that there were people who didn’t know that, but I was unprepared for the grim reality of such basic ignorance. So I will explain in even blunter terms.

There are no principled anarchists in Oregon, and I assume that the same is true of all of the other States in the Union. There are quite a few schizophrenics and brain-fried druggies, but aside from people who are mentally disordered, all of the anarchists are fake. They are all just a bunch of godless commies.

In fact, it hardly matters the name of the group; antifa, black bloc, by any means necessary, &c., they are all just thugs for revolutionary international socialism.

Their multiple brands essentially combine the experimental dynamism of venture capitalism with the operational discretion of independent terrorist cells. But they are all the same in one very important respect:

They only want to disrupt the current social order in order to replace it with the socialist tyranny of their dreams – sick dreams in which they’re insiders with power to abuse, instead of social rejects.

And make no mistake: every complaint that they have is projection. When they talk about the (fictitious) jackboots on their necks, they’re picturing their (physical) jackboots on yours. And you don't want to know what happens next.

They are evil. You should never, ever let one babysit for you. They hate themselves, their parents, their species, and their Creator; so if they have any interest in your kids at all, it is an unhealthy one. I’m dead fucking serious.

And you should take them seriously, because unlike neo-Nazi LARPers, theirs is a living movement that controls multiple countries to this very day. China alone is what, about a fifth of humanity?

They are worthless garbage people individually; but they are borrowing power from a global movement, and they want to exercise that power over you (and your kids). And we must do literally whatever it takes to prevent that.

Diversity Is Tyranny

Freedom is self-rule. But anarchy is not freedom, because then you would be ruled by everyone else’s whims, only controlling a very small space around your body (if that).

The true opposite of tyranny is subsidiarity, like how the true opposite of love is indifference (while hatred is passion twisted). In subsidiarity, each decision is made at the smallest unit that is directly affected by it; so other families don’t have a vote on your family’s decisions that only affect them indirectly. They don’t have a vote in how you discipline your kids, or what jobs you take.

Likewise your city’s decisions are not the county’s business, and your county doesn’t need the state micromanaging its internal matters. If your state doesn’t touch the Colorado River then you don’t get a say in the Interstate Compact, and so on.

This is because in order to have self-rule, you must live in a society whose values accord with yours. And the further someone is from you geographically, the further they will be in their material interests, as well as their cultural heritage and family line.

Self-rule requires homogeneity. So then it can be seen that diversity damages the self-rule of the people who were already there, who did not choose to leave their kind and go live among another. And it is blatantly unjust, because the immigrants still have somewhere else in the world that is ordered according to their values, while the locals end up with zero.

Therefore, diversity is tyranny. It is a Satanic evil, and it is on us as Christians to stop the Social Justice cult in its wicked plan to destroy all self-rule everywhere, starting with Western Civ.

We unhyphenated Americans have an additional handicap to overcome, because many affect to believe that we don’t even exist, or have no right to. But let that resistance firm your will; it means that our survival as a people is at stake, and we must fight harder.

Contrary Indicators: The Peculiar Orthodoxy of Fake News

We live in strange times. Advocacy journalism has rendered an entire category of media nigh worthless, since we wallow in a sea of Fake News written by activist True Believers with bylines.

But there is a useful concept from the hyper-competitive world of stock market daytraders, which is that of the contrary indicator: something whose price reliably moves in the opposite direction of what you trade in, so it can be predictive in the inverse.

And then of course you get the notion of people or institutions as contrary indicators: they reliably do exactly the wrong thing, so if you learn that they’re making a move, then you should do the opposite.

So that takes us to the whole pro-vax and anti-vax thing, which is a rabbit hole that I have carefully steered clear of. But since the anti-vax position seemed to be the province of vapid New Age SWPL types, I was prejudiced against it.

That all changed last month, when Twitter went all-in on the pro-vax side. They are such a hyper-partisan, SJW-controlled organization that if a guy with a penis and a Y-chromosome says he’s a woman, they think you shouldn’t even be allowed to question it.

And since they make a habit of inverting the truth, if they want to hide anti-vax content, then that tells me that the vaccine industry apparently has something to hide -- and it’s probably somehow anti-American and anti-Christian.

So congratulations, Twitter! You finally managed to do what no one else could do: make me question the utility and safety of vaccines. It’s almost something to be proud of, since it means that I think you’re reliable.

Reliably wrong.

A contrary indicator.

The Last Straw: The When of Making Ourselves Ungovernable (2/3)

In Our Fake Elites, I explored the question of why make ourselves ungovernable. To summarize, if space aliens abducted our ruling class tomorrow, the rest of us would be better off. So we have nothing to lose and everything to gain by upsetting their applecarts.

That then raises (not begs) the question of when. There are some clear bright lines, such as mass gun confiscation, since that is a standard precursor to tyranny. But if things reach that point, then the proper response might very well be armed resistance; so the right time for non-violent resistance would necessarily be before that.

On the other hand, there are also potential drawbacks to going too soon. The most obvious is that it must be a mass movement to be effective, so those who go first must be able to maintain in the face of legal trouble. And there’s no point in taking that risk if there’s no chance of starting the avalanche.

I propose that the way to square that circle is to immediately start talking about mass civil disobedience, but not doing it yet. Start planting the seeds, that this is a thing that we may need to do, as well as talking about how (looking at historical examples).

So when? The final trigger must be common sense, as how the time to start an armed rebellion must necessarily be no later than when your arms would be taken away.

And for a non-violent resistance, the equivalent would be the means of organizing. So using the currently available tools for organizing, spread the word of why and how to make ourselves ungovernable. And then when those communication tools are taken away, that is the signal.

That is the last straw, after which everyone scatters to the wind and does his own thing.

Our Fake Elites: The Why of Making Ourselves Ungovernable (1/3)

There is no meritocracy. Everything that you have heard is a lie. The only things that our ruling class is actually good at are being well-spoken, well-dressed, well-connected, and well-credentialed. Habitually punctual, except when not. Usually not too many drugs.

But you cannot break in from below. It is all about class. If you do not have acceptable table manners, then literally nothing else matters.

And they can teach those table manners to drooling morons from the other side of the world, if they think it would signal their virtue as anti-Western anti-Christians.

So we are ruled by arrogant, contemptuous snobs who are also historically ignorant, poorly educated, intellectually lazy, morally degenerate, grossly unethical, narcissistic, nepotistic, lying, cheating, thieving, evil little midwits who think they’re better than you.

No, really. They act as if they’re so much better than you that not only could they run your life better than you can, but they shouldn’t even ask you. They should just do it.

It makes me bitter. They act like if you weren’t such a retard, then you would be thankful to them for enslaving you to their kritarchy of black-robed tyrants and their technocracy of fake experts, who are really just a bunch of pseudo-scientific snake-oil salesmen with tall height and good hair.

So you’re going to get what they want for you, good and hard. And you’d better be thankful, or else they have ways of making you sorry.

Except there's just one little problem with their vision of the world: it's inverted. They need us. Not the other way around.

So their entire worldview is built on a foundation of lies, and it would be trivial for us to exploit such a glaring weakness.

Trivial for us to show our true power...

By making ourselves ungovernable.

A Handbook for Non-Sociopaths

On the subject of a Civil War II or Re-Revolution, it occurs to me that I should lay down some ground rules if you want to be on our side, in the case that non-violent resistance does not work.

One very simple moral principle is that children before the age of reason are intrinsically innocent. So that means at the very least none younger than high-school age, and therefore no shooting up any place where pre-teens may reasonably be expected.

Another logical consequence is that bombs are inherently immoral, because you do not know who may be hit by them. I suppose the moral calculus is more complicated for actual bombardiers in a theater of war, but that is not what we’re talking about. So don’t.

And if I have to explain to you why torture is unacceptable, then you should just go and be a leftist. I’m sure that they’ll welcome you with open arms. But here we follow Jesus.

After that, things get fuzzier. But only necessary wars are just. If you coulda maintained your autonomy elsewise, then you shoulda done that instead.

So if non-violent resistance can recover self-rule, then none of the rest even matters. But I figured that I should lay it all out explicitly just in case, since half of all people are even dumber than the median.